Government is crazy. It wants to curb population through planned programs, yet it continues to create environments of dependency (primarily through an education system that does not teach self sufficiency and sustainability)… It is government cycles doing this…very obvious when you stop and think about it.

ANYWAY, BECAUSE OF UR STUPIDITY, OUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN WILL BE MORE SLAVES THAT THOSE BEHIND US AND THAN US…. WHO CARES, JUST KEEP BREEDING, IDIOTS….

I don’t care who does it. I don’t care HOW they do it.

I want Africa for Gazelles and Cheetahs, not bush meat eating Congolese. Sorry. I don’t care what color they are – there are too many of em.

nice idea, but not on the expence of my pocket, here in Slovakia Roma speaking
vy budete robit, my budeme rodit – you /whites/ will do the work and we /roma/ will give birth our children

you can have 100 children per one woman, but plese dont speak give me support because i have children and many children and You who work every day, you have only one or two, so i need money from state budget, i need money from international help …. and i do another one or two children at the meantime

du

Those of you that still believe in a god and/or the tooth fairy or easter bunny are brainwashed fools.

Let’s pretend there’s a genuine scientific “controversy” about the basic reality of climate change (there isn’t: there’s mainstream science and then there are oil lobbyists, just like there were doctors who said cigarettes caused cancer and FLACKS who said “we’re not so sure”). But let’s fantasize for a second that your side has some credibility and isn’t just propaganda. Your fun-house mirror thesis, that scientists at universities and nonprofits are the more financially corrupt side of this argument, is hilarious.

Yeah, a conspiracy of financiers is making up global warming to screw energy companies. I almost have to give you credit for the sheer balls of this internecine plutocratic misdirection. “It’s those bankers — pay no attention to the oil baron behind the curtain!” It’s an amazing feat that you’ve actually forced me to stand up for the Wall St. bloodsuckers: this is their fault only inasmuch as they’re in bed with Big Oil. Which is to say, plenty. 10 of the 20 richest firms on the planet are oil companies. The idea that any other industry could push them around, even the bankers, is a preposterous canard.

So oil companies have gotten a little more subtle with the paper trail (as you probably know better than most). They still have every reason to push denial. I’m not convinced by your claims that they’re being outspent. Even supposing financial parity, the oil people have much less of a motive to be objective.

It’s fair to note that I hope you’re right, and life on this planet will go on more or less as it currently exists forever, despite whatever externalities an industrial civilization of 7-9 billion people (with weak or nonexistent checks on private interests, despite the crocodile tears we see from tycoons and their lackeys) can ever produce. But I doubt it. I do, however, sympathize with your basic suspicion of the radical measures that fixing climate change would probably require. It is a legitimately difficult political problem to address such a thing without screwing up our notions of a free market. I’m not even 100% convinced we can even do anything about it. Maybe instead we should just cross our fingers and see…but that hardly makes the arguments you’ve presented here valid.

Imagine for a minute you believed global warming was true. What a pain that would be, right? Much easier to make like an ostrich.

But hey, if it makes you feel better, you’ve already “won.” We’re going to find out the truth the hard way. The greens are obviously, utterly, blatantly *losing*. This somehow makes the Big Lie of oil-company persecution all the more urgent and shrill. This has been a key tactic of the right in general: look at how the more “unions” and “regulation” have been pummeled into irrelevance since the 80s, the more fervently they’re invoked as boogeymen.

Personally, I think the particulars of climate change might surprise everyone, environmentalists included. Hell, it may even be a good thing (after all the displaced masses of refugees settle down). Let’s all buy some beachfront property in Canada! But one way or another, in a decade or two this “controversy” will be moot. We’ll have a pretty good idea who was lying. And assuming you haven’t been drowned by a hurricane or starved by a famine, I suspect you’ll have reason to look back on this post and think, “my God, what a malignant toady I was.”

[Note: I just read the much more disgusting first part of your series, complete with "Kenya" racebait, Godwin's Law fulfillment, Alex Jones links (!!!! Seriously?), the word "lamestream," spooky references to "your family's freedom," and other such embarrassments, and now I feel like a sucker for even responding to you. Your brain is clearly in a Fox News death grip. Sigh.]

Our best hope is that the rabid, evil brand of politics you practice will nonetheless functionally serve as a check on some of the easy left-wing targets you set up here, a few of whom are truly unworthy of influence: Prince Charles, the idiot Democratic leadership in Congress, and a handful of genuinely crazy radical environmentalists. But the latter will never come within reach of power UNLESS you are so willfully wrong about climate change that the world ends up going to almost-literal Hell, and a backlash of blind Luddite rage follows, which I think your tactics can only make more likely. So congrats, you’re helping the Gaians.